![\"3D](\"https:\/\/archive-lynchlaw.pfgsandbox.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/pexels-mushroom-4485456web-1024x683.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Three-dimensional printing and scanning are opening up new ways to make and re-create products. What\u2019s more, the technology also is accessible to the public. Anyone with design software and a couple of thousand dollars to spend on a desktop 3-D printer can turn a computer design, whether it\u2019s theirs or not, into a tangible object in a matter of hours or even minutes. So, how do intellectual property laws \u2014 those concerning patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets \u2014 impact a technology that lends itself to reproduction?<\/p>\n
\u201cGenerally speaking, the big concern now is that designs can get out,\u201d said Kathleen Kuznicki, a registered patent attorney with The Lynch Law Group in Cranberry Township. She said patents are published but don\u2019t typically contain the details needed to replicate a product. They also are enforced for 20 years after being issued. Still, because patent infringement means to make, use or offer for sale an infringing product, people must be careful. They also do not have to be aware they are infringing on patent rights. However, she said the highly detailed computer-engineered designs used in 3-D printing are considered trade secrets, and because they are electronic, they can easily be leaked over the Internet.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat\u2019s most likely going to happen is that a company that probably knows it\u2019s in infringement is going put out an engineering design, and then random, innocent people are going to be taking those designs off the Internet and reproducing a part,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
The infringement will damage the company that originally created the design because fewer customers are buying its product. However, Kuznicki said the laws are difficult to enforce, especially considering the company, in that case, would be going after customers and regular citizens in violation. Doing so would be a bad public relations move, she said.<\/p>\n
Kuznicki said manufacturers that do on-demand 3-D printing must know their customers either own or license the rights to the design they are making. \u201cA manufacturer should be very careful on anything, 3-D or not,\u201d she said. She equated the issue to that of a t-shirt printing business. If a customer sends them a Pittsburgh Steelers logo, they know they can\u2019t reproduce it without permission.\u00a0 However, not all designs are that well-known or clear-cut. She said businesses that are replicating parts, such as those in an automobile, are generally safe from violations as long as they are not using the exact engineered drawings.<\/p>\n
Kuznicki said individuals can\u2019t copy or replicate protected property. However, she said as long as they are copying a design for personal use, not widely distributing or profiting from selling it, they are unlikely to be pursued by those holding the rights. There are a number of recent examples of Intellectual property rights issues being raised by the reproduction of objects in pop culture.<\/p>\n
Rewind to the National Football League\u2019s Super Bowl in February. Katy Perry\u2019s halftime show performance featured two backup dancers dressed in cartoonish shark costumes that became the Internet memes \u201cLeft Shark\u201d and \u201cRight Shark.\u201d Almost immediately after the Super Bowl, people started putting the sharks on t-shirts and other products, and one enterprising designer even used a 3-D printer to create and start selling Left Shark figurines. Perry claimed she had copyright protection on the character because she designed the show, which included the shark costumes.<\/p>\n
Kuznicki said the designer stopped selling the figurines, but he did have a valid argument that Left Shark itself was not copyrightable, although the drawings might have been. Perry also tried to get trademark protection of Left Shark because of the proliferation of the character, but the U.S. Trademark Office rejected her request because she was not using the image as a designation of
\ngoods and services, Kuznicki said. \u201cThe more common (the technology) becomes, the more court cases will be created,\u201d she said<\/p>\n
Kathleen Kuznicki<\/a> assists business owners, entrepreneurs, and inventors with all things related to intellectual property and brand protection, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and licensing. She can be reached via email at kkuznicki@archive-lynchlaw.pfgsandbox.com or by calling our office at 724-776-8000.<\/p>\n This article was first published in the July 2015 issue of Butler County Business Matters. Download the article: 3-D Printers Raise Concerns About IP<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Three-dimensional printing and scanning are opening up new ways to make and re-create products. What\u2019s more, the technology also is accessible to the public. Anyone with design software and a couple of thousand dollars to spend on a desktop 3-D …